![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |
Endearing Myths, Enduring Truths: Enabling Partnerships |
||
Conclusions
But the uniqueness of BPDs overall experience has not been in imposing trisector partnerships. After all, the water and sanitation partnership in Port-au-Prince in Haiti involves an international NGO, GRET, working with a state-owned utility. The Global Alliance for Workers and Communities has little more than nominal public sector involvement, and indeed has to date progressed with scant engagement with the labor movement. The road safety initiatives in Vietnam and Costa Rica have had little real civil society engagement to date, and the NGO engaged in the road safety partnership in Ghana was actually created by the Global Road Safety Partnership. Almost all of the water and sanitation partnerships are trisector, but the main corporate partners are also experimenting in other approaches to contract compliance that are rooted in legal, technological and pricing innovations, rather than partnership-related ones. Only the Natural Resources Cluster partnerships have been exclusively trisector, but even here there were several that did not get off the ground, and one that was abandoned midstream. BPDs trisector partnership approach has been permissive rather than prescriptive. It has created the possibilities for institutional innovation in addressing both individual and common organisational goals, rather than seeking to impose a one-size fits all model across extraordinarily diverse situations and challenges. This way of appreciating a trisector partnership approach appears, from the evidence to date, to be effective in that:
On this basis, BPDs experience clearly demonstrates that this trisector partnership approach can deliver the resources, competencies, legitimacy, and critically the will, energy, and focus to succeed, where institutions and sectors working alone have previously failed.
|
|||
|
< Extended Partnership Benefits
Previous | Next Publication
Credits >
|
|||
|
|